Approved
User:
Date:
Jul 27, 2016 - 11:32:57 pm
Showing changed values only. [show all]
Before changes:
Jul 27, 2016 - 11:05:18 am
Option name:
Yes, in unfiltered form, but only when the opinion is more than just profanity
Yes, in unfiltered form, but only when an opinion is more than just profanity
Option name:
Yes, with asterisks and only when the opinion is more than just profanity
Yes, with asterisks and only when an opinion is more than just profanity
This change was automatically approved.
These are the current values.
New record
User:
Date:
Jul 27, 2016 - 11:05:18 am
Title:
Should vulgarisms be allowed on OpiWiki?
Category:
Matter
Option name:
Yes, in unfiltered form and any context
Option name:
Yes, in unfiltered form, but only when an opinion is more than just profanity
Option name:
Yes, with asterisks and in any context
Option name:
Yes, with asterisks and only when an opinion is more than just profanity
Option name:
No, vulgarisms should not be allowed on OpiWiki
Options desc:
Yes, in unfiltered form and any context: E.g. "He's a stupid asshole, fuck him for what he did with our economy"
Yes, in unfiltered form, but only when an opinion is more than just profanity: none
Yes, with asterisks and in any context: E.g. "He's a stupid a**hole, f*ck him for what he did with our economy"
Yes, with asterisks and only when an opinion is more than just profanity: none
No, vulgarisms should not be allowed on OpiWiki: none
Title desc:
OpiWiki is The Encyclopedia of Opinions. One of the ideas behind this term, is to try to keep the discussions on the site substantive and different than what discussions usually are on the Internet. For example, we have a rule to require at least one argument or a point of contribution in an opinion (see the discussion regarding that matter [link=http://meta.opi.wiki/discuss/110080/Guideline-an-OpiWiki-opinion-requires-at-least-one-argument-or-a-point-of]here[/link]). Considering our goals, should we allow vulgarisms and profanity on the site?
Max. options selected:
1
Search tags:
vulgarisms and discussing
This record was automatically approved.