Content license

Matter

As being an active member or bot Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap, possibly the two largest open content projects in the world it is obvious that I come up with the content licensing terms of OpiWiki. Right now - as far as I (don't) see it - licensing is undefined which - by law - results defaulting to full copyright which is extremely unfortunate. As a license I would prefer an established open content license (my advice is [b]CreativeCommons Attribution[/b] or [b]Attribution-ShareAlike[/b]), apart from the website icons and graphical elements. To help this there should be an easy and obvious way to link to a given content or graph which would satisfy attribution requirements (as far as I see that's already done, just mentioning it).

licensing,
open content